Parliament Tracker
A non-partisan civic data and literacy project by CAPE, monitoring Singapore’s Parliamentary debate, and Member of Parliament (MP) attendance and performance.
All Issues
14th Parliament of Singapore:
Disclosure
All Parliament Tracker data is compiled by CAPE volunteers, based on published Hansard data. CAPE accepts no responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of our Parliament Tracker issues and recommends that users exercise their own skill and care with respect to its use.
Methodology
Last updated 29 January 2024
Item I. MP attendance by Party
I-1. Attendance rate by Party
We entrust MPs with representing our interests and making decisions on our behalf. Knowing attendance rates allows us to hold our representatives accountable and judge their commitment to their duties.
Here is our methodology for calculating the attendance rates by Party:
- Gather the official list of MPs who were present from Hansard.
- Divide the number of MPs present by the total number of MPs belonging to that Party.
- Multiply this result by 100 to express it as a percentage.
- Calculate the simple average by adding up the attendance percentages for each sitting and divide by the total number of sittings considered.
Do note that attendance data based on the Hansard only tracks attendance at roll call. MPs may not be present throughout the entire Parliament session. Some citizens have observed in photos and livestream videos that Parliament sessions can be largely empty, except during important votes or debates.
Item II. Parliamentary Questions (PQ)
II-1. Average number of questions asked per MP
A higher average number of questions can indicate a proactive parliament, Parties, and/or MPs actively scrutinising government actions and policies. This helps ensure transparency and holds the government accountable to the public.
Here is our methodology for calculating the average number of PQs asked per MP:
- Gather the official list of oral and written parliamentary questions (PQs) for the parliamentary sittings within the month from Hansard.
- Divide the sum of PQs asked by all MPs within each Party, across all sittings within the month, by the number of MPs within each Party excluding any appointment holders.
Ministers, Minister of States, and Parliamentary Secretaries traditionally do not ask PQs as they represent the Executive branch, which is responsible for implementing government policies and decisions. Asking questions of themselves within the legislative branch could create a conflict of interest or blur the lines between the two branches.
The Speaker and Deputy Speakers are responsible for ensuring the smooth and orderly conduct of parliamentary proceedings. Hence, they do not ask PQs or participate in debates, but rather enforce the rules and ensure everyone gets a fair chance to speak.
II-2. Percentage of PQs asked vs. seats share
Every Party, regardless of size, should have the opportunity to raise issues and hold the government accountable. Measuring the spread of questions across Parties, against their seat shares in parliament, informs us whether the Parties are given the opportunities to do so and are actively utilising them.
Here is our methodology for calculating the percentages:
- Gather the official list of oral and written parliamentary questions (PQs) for the parliamentary sittings within the month from Hansard.
- To obtain the percentage of PQs asked per Party, divide the sum of PQs from all MPs per Party by the total number of PQs from all MPs. Multiply this result by 100 to express it as a percentage.
- To obtain the percentage of seats share per Party, divide the number of MPs per party by the total number of MPs excluding appointment holders. Multiply this result by 100 to express it as a percentage.
- To calculate the delta between the percentages, minus the percentage of PQs asked per Party by the percentage of seat share per Party.
Deltas below zero indicate that the Party is speaking below their proportion of seat share in Parliament. Conversely, deltas above zero signal that the Party is punching above their weight.
Ministers, Minister of States, and Parliamentary Secretaries traditionally do not ask PQs as they represent the Executive branch, which is responsible for implementing government policies and decisions. Asking questions of themselves within the legislative branch could create a conflict of interest or blur the lines between the two branches.
The Speaker and Deputy Speakers are responsible for ensuring the smooth and orderly conduct of parliamentary proceedings. Hence, they do not ask PQs or participate in debates, but rather enforce the rules and ensure everyone gets a fair chance to speak.
II-3. No. of PQs asked by Party and MP
A higher average number of questions can indicate a proactive parliament, Parties, and/or MPs actively scrutinising government actions and policies. This helps ensure transparency and holds the government accountable to the public.
Our methodology is as follows:
- Gather the official list of oral and written parliamentary questions (PQs) for the parliamentary sittings within the month from Hansard.
- Sum the total number of PQs asked by each MP.
Ministers, Minister of States, and Parliamentary Secretaries traditionally do not ask PQs as they represent the Executive branch, which is responsible for implementing government policies and decisions. Asking questions of themselves within the legislative branch could create a conflict of interest or blur the lines between the two branches.
The Speaker and Deputy Speakers are responsible for ensuring the smooth and orderly conduct of parliamentary proceedings. Hence, they do not ask PQs or participate in debates, but rather enforce the rules and ensure everyone gets a fair chance to speak.
II-4. No. of PQs put to each Ministry by Party
Tracking the number of parliamentary questions (PQs) directed towards each Ministry may offer valuable insights into public concerns, ministerial performance, and potential policy issues. For instance, a surge in questions directed towards one particular Ministry might indicate public dissatisfaction with its performance or emerging problems requiring attention. Some Ministries may consistently receive fewer questions than others, as they could be dealing with less publicly engaging topics and/or highly technical subjects that might require specialised knowledge, which could deter MPs from engaging.
Our methodology is as follows:
- Gather the official list of oral and written PQs for the parliamentary sittings within the month from Hansard.
- Sum the total number of PQs asked by MPs to each Ministry.
Item III. Parliamentary bills
III-1. Bills introduced
The official list of Bills introduced at every parliamentary sitting can be found at Hansard: https://www.parliament.gov.sg/parliamentary-business/bills-introduced.
III-2. Bills passed
The official list of Bills passed at every parliamentary sitting can be found at Hansard: https://www.parliament.gov.sg/parliamentary-business/bills-introduced.
III-3. No. of MPs who spoke on Bill at second reading
The second reading is the first major opportunity for MPs to debate the general merits and principles of a Bill. The number of speakers can indicate the level of interest and engagement the Bill has generated among MPs. More participation suggests a complex or controversial Bill that has drawn significant attention. Also, more participation signals that the Bill is properly scrutinised and that potential concerns are being addressed.
Our methodology is as follows:
- Gather the official list of Bills that were debated at second reading at every Parliamentary sitting from Hansard: https://www.parliament.gov.sg/parliamentary-business/bills-introduced.
- Extract the official report of the second reading of each Bill from Hansard.
- Sum the total number of MPs who spoke at the second reading of each Bill.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
FAQs on the Parliament Tracker Project
What is Parliament Tracker
Parliament Tracker is an independent, non-partisan civic project by the Community for Advocacy and Political Education (CAPE) that seeks to enhance citizenry understanding of and access to Singapore’s Parliamentary proceedings. Our issues track and analyse data on Parliamentary Business and issues, and Member of Parliament (MP) attendance, and MP engagement in Parliamentary question time.
This is the first online resource which tracks and analyses these data points. Our first Parliament Tracker project was launched in 2018 when CAPE was still a student organization. It has been relaunched as of 2024 with a refreshed and rigorous methodology.
Our dream is for an official and readily accessible system and database to be put in place, so as to render our project unnecessary. Examples of official Parliamentary debate and data tracking systems that are easy to access and navigate exist in many Westminster systems exist, such as the UK Parliament and India’s Lok Sabha. This is an achievable ideal for the “Smart Nation” that is Singapore.
Why track Parliament?
Transparency of and public access to the legislative body of our country are fundamental civic principles of democracy. Such data and transparency also hold MPs accountable to the public and their constituencies for their attendance, engagement, and performance in Parliament. Many democracies around world have official and live tracking systems of their legislators’ attendance and speaking records which are readily and publicly accessible.
At present in Singapore, such data is only available to the public retroactively via the published Hansard. The data is also limited in showing only attendance at the start of the session. Official tracking of MP engagement and performance is not carried out.
In a 2020 speech, PAP MP Mr Murali Pillai called for digital tracking of MP attendance and questions in Parliament to boost accountability and improve Parliamentary proceedings. In 2021, proposed plans for live facial recognition tracking of MP attendance was shelved during the Covid-19 period, and has not yet been reinstated.
(Back in 2018 when CAPE’s Parliament Tracker was launched, Parliamentary live broadcasts was also not available. This has then accentuated the lack of public access to Parliamentary proceedings. Live broadcasts was only finally made available in 2021 following renewed calls by the public against strong government resistance.)
Where can I access the primary data sources?
Hansard data can be viewed online at the official Parliament website here.
Singapore Law Watch provides an accessible repository of latest Legislation and recently introduced Bills here. These are based on the Attorney-General Chambers’ (AGC) Singapore Statutes Online (SSO) repository. The eGazette website provides the official published versions of legislation.
FAQs on Parliament
How does Parliament work? (e.g. Question time, Bills, etc)
See this Parliamentary Guide by the Parliament of Singapore:
For more information on Parliament in Singapore, please visit the official Parliament website for more resources.
What is the Hansard?
The Hansard, or the Official Reports, are the transcripts of parliamentary debates. The name “Hansard” is a legacy of Singapore’s British colonial heritage, and whose Parliament is based on the British Westminster system of Parliament. Its name is derived from Thomas Curson Hansard, an early 19th century London printer and publisher, who was the British Parliament’s first official printer of its debate transcripts.
The Hansard is available 10 days after a Parliament sitting. Singapore’s Hansard can be viewed online at the official Parliament website here.
What are Parliamentary Questions (PQs) / Supplementary Questions?
From the Parliament website: “At the start of each Parliament sitting, one and a half hours are reserved for Question Time. This is a chance for MPs to raise questions with the Ministers on their respective Ministries’ responsibilities. Through questioning the Ministers, MPs make the Government accountable for its actions and allows the public to listen to a spectrum of views and opinions to find out how decisions affecting them are made. This forms an integral part of Parliament’s role. Questions may be filed by any MP who can seek either oral or written replies from Ministers.”
Parliamentary Questions (PQ) refer to queries raised by MPs during the above mentioned Question Time. PQs have to be fielded 7 days ahead of the Parliament sitting for the Speaker of Parliament’s admission. The Speaker may ask the MP to alter the PQ or reject the PQ based on the rules of the Standing Orders. MPs may ask a total of 5 PQs per sitting, of which only 3 may be for oral answers.
Oral answers will given during Question Time by respective Ministers, and to which follow-up Supplementary Questions may be asked by MPs. Written answers will be published in the Hansard without opportunity for follow up Supplementary Questions.
The items of business to be considered on the sitting day, including PQs, are printed in an Order Paper. You may find the Order Papers here.
What are NMPs, NCMPs?
Non-Constituency MPs (NCMPs) and Nominated MPs (NMPs) are non-elected Members of Parliament (MP). The majority of MPs are elected MPs who are elected into Parliament at General Elections.
NCMPs
From the Parliament website: “The Constitution allows for up to 12 NCMPs to be declared as elected. NCMPs are declared as MPs from opposition candidates who had contested in a General Election, were not voted in but had received the highest percentage of votes amongst the unelected candidates from the opposition parties. This ensures there will always be a minimum number of opposition members in Parliament and that views other than the Government’s can be expressed in Parliament.”
NMPs
From the Parliament website: “A constitutional provision for the appointment of up to 9 Nominated Members of Parliament (NMPs) was made in 1990 to ensure a wide representation of community views in Parliament. NMPs are appointed by the President of Singapore for a term of two and a half years on the recommendation of a Special Select Committee of Parliament chaired by the Speaker. NMPs contribute independent and non-partisan views in Parliament.”
NMPs are nominated via Functional Groups representing different segments of society, including (i) business and industry; (ii) the professions; (iii) labour movement; (iv) social service organisations; (v) civic and people sector; (vi) tertiary education institutions; and (vii) media, arts and sports organisations.
The NMP institution has been a highly controversial institution, with criticisms of being “undemocratic” as appointed, unelected MPs. Former NMP Anthea Ong’s seminal book on the NMP institution offers a comprehensive analysis of the institution, experiences of past NMPs, and ways moving forward for the institution and Singapore’s democratic development.
CAPE ParlTracker Dataset
All Parliament Tracker data © 2024 by the Community for Advocacy and Political Education (CAPE) are licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
This license requires that reusers give credit to the creator. It allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, for noncommercial purposes only. If others modify or adapt the material, they must license the modified material under identical terms.
Would like to collaborate?
Contact us on our social media or email.